REPUTATION IN BARGAINING: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 40 (2) , 241-259
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/40.2.241
Abstract
This article examines a sequence of two bargaining games where a single buyer participates in both. The bargaining games are modeled with two‐sided private information and are “linked” through the buyer's valuation, which is positively correlated across bargaining games. I empirically test the comparative static results obtained from the model's unique equilibrium outcome using National Football League (NFL) contract data. The empirical results suggest that an NFL team's contract negotiations are affected by not only the terms agreed to in the team's prior contract negotiations but also the length of time required to negotiate these prior contracts.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical Test of a Separating Equilibrium in National Football League Contract NegotiationsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1999
- Maximal strategy sets for continuous-time game theoryJournal of Economic Theory, 1992
- Bargaining Under Two-Sided Incomplete Information: The Unrestricted Offers CaseOperations Research, 1988
- Experimental Tests of a Sequential Equilibrium Reputation ModelEconometrica, 1988
- Reputation in the Simultaneous Play of Multiple OpponentsThe Review of Economic Studies, 1987
- Bargaining with Two-sided Incomplete Information: An Infinite Horizon Model with Alternating OffersThe Review of Economic Studies, 1987
- Reputations in games and marketsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1985
- Reputation and imperfect informationJournal of Economic Theory, 1982
- Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemmaJournal of Economic Theory, 1982