Discrepant Analysis Is Still at Large
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 39 (2) , 826-7
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.2.826-827.2001
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discrepant analysis: how can we test a test?2000
- Discrepant Analysis: How Can We Test a Test?Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2000
- Discrepant AnalysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic testStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- A Biomedical Application of Latent Class Models with Random EffectsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1998
- Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detectingChlamydia trachomatis by A. Hadgu,Statistics in Medicine,16, 1391-1399 (1997)Statistics in Medicine, 1998
- Bias in Discrepant Analysis: When Two Wrongs Don’t Make a RightJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Discrepant analysis—or behaviour?The Lancet, 1997
- Bayesian Estimation of Disease Prevalence and the Parameters of Diagnostic Tests in the Absence of a Gold StandardAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1995