Separation of melanic and fulvic andisols
Open Access
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
- Vol. 34 (2) , 303-306
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1988.10415686
Abstract
It has been recognized in Japan and Alaska that vegetational effects in particular, of grass and forest ecosystems contribute significantly to the formation of melanic and fulvic Andisols, respectively (SHOJI et al. 1988a, b). Although the two Andisols have thick, humus-rich horizons, they indicate remarkable differences in the humus characteristics. Melanic Andisols have high humic acid to fulvic acid ratios and contain the A type humic acid characterized by the highest degree of humification. On the other hand, fulvic Andisols show low humic acid to fulvic acid ratios and mostly contain the P type humic acid with a low degree of humification, followed by the B type humic acid (HONNA et al. 1988; SHOJI et al. 1988a, b). These differences in the humus characteristics are closely related to the soil color.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- PROPERTIES OF SPODOSOLS AND ANDISOLS SHOWING CLIMOSEQUENTIAL AND BIOSEQUENTIAL RELATIONS IN SOUTHERN HAKKODA, NORTHEASTERN JAPANSoil Science, 1988
- Clay Mineralogical and Chemical Properties of Nonallophanic Andepts (Andisols) from Oregon, USASoil Science Society of America Journal, 1987
- Humus composition of mountain soils in Central Japan with special reference to the distribution of P type humic acidSoil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1967