Categorical Programs for Remedial and Handicapped Students: Issues of Validity
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Exceptional Children
- Vol. 55 (2) , 147-158
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298805500206
Abstract
This article examines the instructional and political validity of current educational policy regarding categorical programs for low-achieving elementary school students. A widely recognized problem in the categorical organization of services for these students is fragmentation at all levels. Attempts to reduce that fragmentation by unifying the categorical programs must address three issues each in the realms of instructional and political validity. Among the instructional validity issues are questions about the, similarities and differences between learning disabled and remedial students in instructional levels, learning rates, and “learning styles.” Data from two studies suggest that the similarities in instructional level and learning rates are greater than the differences. The political issues requiring resolution before implementation of a unified system are protection and equitable distribution of resources, participation in decision making, and protection of jobs. Benefits of a unified system and issues that policy makers must address are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Substance over Style: Assessing the Efficacy of Modality Testing and TeachingExceptional Children, 1987
- Grouping for Instruction in the elementary SchoolEducational Psychologist, 1987
- A Theory of School and Classroom OrganizationEducational Psychologist, 1987
- Practice of Learning Disabilities as Social PolicyLearning Disability Quarterly, 1987
- A Comparison of Differences Between Students Labeled Learning Disabled and Low Achieving on Measures of Classroom PerformanceJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
- Reading Instruction in Special Education Resource RoomsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1986
- How Shall We Individualize Instruction—Or Should We?Remedial and Special Education, 1984
- Similarities and Differences Between Low Achievers and Students Classified Learning DisabledThe Journal of Special Education, 1982
- Differential Diagnosis—Prescriptive Teaching: A Critical AppraisalReview of Educational Research, 1979
- Examining the Benefits and Prevalence of Modality Considerations in Special EducationThe Journal of Special Education, 1977