Mammography. State of the art
- 1 February 1984
- Vol. 53 (S3) , 652-657
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<652::aid-cncr2820531310>3.0.co;2-i
Abstract
In recent years, the criticism of mammography as a diagnostic and/or survey procedure has decreased, primarily due to the perception that there has been an increase in quality and a concomitant decrease in risk. A review of the physical changes in mammographic equipment, the characteristics of current image receptors and dosimetry indicates that this assumption is correct. The results of the examination of 280,000 women from the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project centers also support this conclusion. When all factors are considered it is reasonable to conclude that the potential benefits of mammography far outweigh the minimal risk incurred by the examination.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: Five-Year Summary ReportCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1982
- Mammography 1982: A Statement of the American Cancer SocietyCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1982
- Historical Review Of Mammographic Imaging Techniques In Terms Of Image Quality And Reduced Radiation DosePublished by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng ,1979
- Risk of Breast Cancer Following Low-Dose Radiation ExposureRadiology, 1979
- Prognosis and treatment in minimal breast cancerThe American Journal of Surgery, 1977
- Present status of thermography, ultrasound and mammography in breast cancer detectionCancer, 1977
- Mammography: A Contrary ViewAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1976
- Xeroradiography of the breast. A comparative study with conventional film mammographyCancer, 1971
- ADVANCES IN MAMMOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUEAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1970
- Xerography of the BreastRadiology, 1968