The diphtheria bacillus and its toxin: a model system
- 1 August 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Epidemiology and Infection
- Vol. 93 (3) , 397-404
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400064998
Abstract
Friedrich Loeffler's classical paper entitled ‘Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung der Mikroorganismen für die Entstehung der Diphtheric beim Menschen, bei der Taube und der Kalbe’ (Studies on the significance of bacteria in causing diphtheria in man, pigeons and calves), was published in 1884. In this paper and those which followed during the next few years, Loeffler described the diphtheria bacillus and its isolation in pure culture, and proved its relationship to the disease diphtheria. While the credit for the discovery of diphtheria toxin must go to Roux & Yersin (1888), Loeffler clearly predicted its existence in his original paper. Because, at autopsy, living ‘virulent’ diphtheria bacilli could only be recovered from experimental animals at the site of injection, Loeffler postulated that the bacteria must have released into the bloodstream a ‘chemical poison’ which caused the characteristicsterilehaemorrhagic lesions in remote organs. He even noted early in 1888 that ‘the bacterial poison resembles in its action the poison [now known as abrin] obtained from jaquiriti seeds, which causes inflammation and the production of false membranes when placed on the mucous membranes either of men or animals’ (cited in Loeffler, 1908). Today we know the reason for this astute observation. Both abrin and diphtheria toxin block protein synthesis in sensitive eucaryotic cells (Collier, 1975; Olsnes & Pihl, 1976; Pappenheimer, 1977), albeit by different mechanisms. Almost a quarter of a century after the discovery of the diphtheria bacillus, the British Medical Research Council published a 718-page volume on diphtheria. In the first chapter Loeffler (1908) reviewed the history of the disease and reminisced at some length about his own early work. By 1908 when this book appeared, a good deal was already known about the epidemiology of diphtheria, the bacteriology of the diphtheria bacillus, its mode of spread by healthy adults and the protective effect of antitoxin. However, other than its proteinaceous nature almost nothing was known of the chemistry of diphtheria toxin or its mode of action. The interpretation of many of Loeffler's astute early observations and questions that puzzled him remained obscure and unanswerable until the discovery of lysogenic conversion to toxinogenicity by Freeman (1951) and the realization that thetoxstructural gene was carried by a bacteriophage (Uchida, Gill & Pappenhcimer, 1971).Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Structural Gene for Tetanus Neurotoxin Is on a PlasmidScience, 1984
- Duplication and amplification of toxin genes in Vibrio choleraeCell, 1983
- Pathogenesis of Shigella Diarrhea. VIII. Evidence for a Transloeation Step in the Cytotoxic Action of Shiga ToxinThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1983
- STUDIES ON THE MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DIPHTHERIAThe Lancet, 1983
- Toxic lectins and related proteinsPublished by Elsevier ,1982
- Comparative Toxicities of Diphtherial Toxin and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin A: Evidence for Different Cell ReceptorsJournal of General Microbiology, 1978
- One molecule of diphtheria toxin fragment a introduced into a cell can kill the cellCell, 1978
- Diphtheria ToxinAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1977
- The Enterotoxin Plasmids of Escherichia ColiThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1974
- Growth and Toxin Synthesis in Batch and Chemostat Cultures of Corynebacterium DiphtheriaeJournal of General Microbiology, 1969