Phase III Trial of Casopitant, a Novel Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist, for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy
- 10 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 27 (32) , 5363-5369
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.21.8511
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this phase III trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regimens containing casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the first cycle in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Patients and Methods Predominantly female patients (98%) diagnosed with breast cancer (96%) who were chemotherapy-naïve and scheduled to receive an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) –based regimen were enrolled onto this multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. All patients received dexamethasone 8 mg intravenously (IV) on day 1 and oral ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 1 to 3. Patients were randomly assigned to a control arm (placebo), a single oral dose casopitant arm (150 mg orally [PO] on day 1), a 3-day oral casopitant arm (150 mg PO on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3), or a 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm (90 mg IV on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting/retching or rescue medications) in the first 120 hours after the initiation of MEC. Results A significantly greater proportion of patients in the single-dose oral casopitant arm, 3-day oral casopitant arm, and 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm achieved complete response (73%, 73%, and 74%, respectively) versus control (59%; P < .0001). The study did not demonstrate a reduced proportion of patients with nausea or significant nausea in those receiving casopitant. Adverse events were balanced among study arms. Conclusion All casopitant regimens studied were more effective than the control regimen. Casopitant was generally well tolerated.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—incidence and impact on patient quality of life at community oncology settingsSupportive Care in Cancer, 2006
- Impact of emesis on clinical and economic outcomes of cancer therapy with highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens: a retrospective analysis of three clinical trialsSupportive Care in Cancer, 2005
- Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Taiwan: physicians’ and nurses’ estimation vs. patients’ reported outcomesSupportive Care in Cancer, 2005
- Rankings and symptom assessments of side effects from chemotherapy: insights from experienced patients with ovarian cancerSupportive Care in Cancer, 2004
- Incidence of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemeticsCancer, 2004
- Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomitingCancer, 2003
- Differential involvement of neurotransmitters through the time course of cisplatin-induced emesis as revealed by therapy with specific receptor antagonistsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2003
- Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: The Importance of Acute Antiemetic ControlThe Oncologist, 2003
- Comparison of the 5-Hydroxytryptamine3(Serotonin) Antagonist Ondansetron (Gr 38032F) with High-Dose Metoclopramide in the Control of Cisplatin-Induced EmesisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- The influence of symptoms of disease and side effects of treatment on compliance with cancer therapy.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988