The controversy regarding routine anaerobic blood cultures
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 108 (6) , 505-506
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00321-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Routine use of anaerobic blood cultures: are they still indicated?The American Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Bacteroides fragilis Bacteremia and Infected Aortic Aneurysm Presenting as Fever of Unknown Origin: Diagnostic Delay without Routine Anaerobic Blood CulturesClinical Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Can We Afford To Do Anaerobic Cultures and Identification? A Positive Point of ViewClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Analysis of 281,797 Consecutive Blood Cultures Performed over an Eight-Year Period: Trends in Microorganisms Isolated and the Value of Anaerobic Culture of BloodClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Anaerobic bacteremia: Incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significanceThe American Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Anaerobic Bacteremia: Decreasing Rate Over a 15-Year PeriodClinical Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Comparison of Two Commercially Available Media for Detection of BacteremiaApplied Microbiology, 1971