Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials
- 1 January 2001
- book chapter
- Published by Wiley
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- The randomized clinical trial: bias in analysis.Circulation, 1981
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- Influence of Adherence to Treatment and Response of Cholesterol on Mortality in the Coronary Drug ProjectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1980
- Controversy in Counting and Attributing Events in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.Psychological Bulletin, 1957