What Every Faculty Developer Needs to Know about Learning Groups
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Michigan Library in To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development
- Vol. 15 (1) , 31-57
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1996.tb00301.x
Abstract
This article advances two related propositions. One is that virtually all of the commonly reported “problems” with learning groups, such as less content coverage, free-riders, and students' feeling that instructors are not teaching unless they are talking, are a natural consequence of they way the groups are being used. The other is that the vast majority of the problems can be prevented by avoiding group assignments that retard the development of effective learning teams and limit student learning. This article will a) examine the underlying causes of the most commonly reported problems with learning groups, b) outline some simple, but effective, strategies for preventing their occurrence in the first place and, c) describe a new tool, the Learning Activity Impact Grid (LAI-Grid), that can be used to ensure that assignments promote both team development and learning.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pre-Instructional Minitests: An Efficient Solution to the Problem of Covering ContentJournal of Management Education, 1994
- CULTURAL DIVERSITY'S IMPACT ON INTERACTION PROCESS AND PERFORMANCE: COMPARING HOMOGENEOUS AND DIVERSE TASK GROUPS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1993
- Problem solving and learning.American Psychologist, 1993
- Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991
- A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989
- CHARM is not enough: Comments on Eich's model of cued recall.Psychological Review, 1986
- Why Some Groups Fail: a Survey of Students' Experiences with Learning GroupsOrganizational Behavior Teaching Review, 1984
- Informative Testing—a Practical Approach for Tutoring With GroupsOrganizational Behavior Teaching Review, 1984
- Cognitive and Affective Outcomes of an Intensive Student Team Learning ExperienceThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1981
- On the cognitive benefits of teaching.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980