Obstetric outcome following epidural analgesia with bupivacaine-adrenaline 0.25% or bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil - a prospective randomized controlled study in 1000 parturients
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 42 (3) , 284-292
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb04918.x
Abstract
Epidural analgesia (EDA) is the most efficient method for pain relief during labour, but there is still a debate as to whether it interferes with the normal process of delivery. Some authors argue that the incidence of instrumental deliveries, Caesarean section, malrotation and protracted labour is increased in parturients receiving EDA. 1000 parturients were prospectively randomized to receive EDA either with a high dose of local anaesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline = HD) or with a low dose (0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil 10 micrograms = LD). The incidence of instrumental delivery and Caesarean section and the need for oxytocin was reduced in the LD compared to HD group. The delivery time was similar with HD and LD among primiparous, but decreased significantly among multiparous in the LD group. The incidence of malrotation was low in both groups. The quality of analgesia was equal during the first stage in the 2 groups, but was lower in the LD group during the second stage. More parturients in the LD group ambulated, but this did not affect the incidence of instrumental delivery. It is concluded that a lower dosage of bupivacaine combined with sufentanil in epidural analgesia significantly improves the obstetric outcome as compared to a higher dosage of bupivacaine with adrenaline using intermittent bolus technique.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Parturients' assessment of water blocks, pethidine, nitrous oxide, paracervical and epidural blocks in labourInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1994
- The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: A randomized, controlled, prospective trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- Factors that influence route of delivery—Active versus traditional labor managementAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- A review of prospectively controlled comparisons of epidural with non-epidural forms of pain relief during labourInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1992
- Epidural analgesia in obstetrics.BMJ, 1989
- The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labour; a randomized study concerning progress in labour and instrumental deliveriesEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1989
- Effectiveness of pain relief in labour: survey of 1000 mothersBMJ, 1982
- Maternal opinion about analgesia for labourAnaesthesia, 1980
- Lumbar epidural analgesia in labour: relation to fetal malposition and instrumental delivery.BMJ, 1977