User‐friendly models of the costs and efficacy of tsetse control: application to sterilizing and insecticidal techniques
- 30 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical and Veterinary Entomology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 293-305
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2005.00573.x
Abstract
Abstract. An interactive programme, incorporating a deterministic model of tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) populations, was developed to predict the cost and effect of different control techniques applied singly or together. Its value was exemplified by using it to compare: (i) the sterile insect technique (SIT), involving weekly releases optimized at three sterile males for each wild male, and (ii) insecticide‐treated cattle (ITC) at 3.5/km2. The isolated pre‐treatment population of adults was 2500 males and 5000 females/km2; if the population was reduced by 90%, its growth potential was 8.4 times per year. However, the population expired naturally when it was reduced to 0.1 wild males/km2, due to difficulties in finding mates, so that control measures then stopped. This took 187 days with ITC and 609 days with SIT. If ITC was used for 87 days to suppress the population by 99%, subsequent control by SIT alone took 406 days; the female population increased by 48% following the withdrawal of ITC and remained above the immediate post‐suppression level for 155 days; the vectorial capacity initially increased seven times and remained above the immediate post‐suppression level for 300 days. Combining SIT and ITC after suppression was a little faster than ITC alone, provided the population had not been suppressed by more than 99.7%. Even when SIT was applied under favourable conditions, the most optimistic cost estimate was 20–40 times greater than for ITC. Modelling non‐isolated unsuppressed populations showed that tsetse invaded ∼8 km into the ITC area compared to ∼18 km for SIT. There was no material improvement by using a 3‐km barrier of ITC to protect the SIT area. In general, tsetse control by increasing deaths is more appropriate than reducing births, and SIT is particularly inappropriate. User‐friendly models can assist the understanding and planning of tsetse control. The model, freely available viahttp://www.tsetse.org, allows further exploration of control strategies with user‐specified assumptions.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tsetse population dynamics.Published by CABI Publishing ,2004
- The sterile insect technique as a component of area-wide integrated pest management of tsetse.Published by CABI Publishing ,2004
- Insecticidal control of tsetse.Published by CABI Publishing ,2004
- Tsetse distribution.Published by CABI Publishing ,2004
- Insecticide-treated cattle against tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae): what governs success?Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2003
- Application of DNA markers to identify the individual-specific hosts of tsetse feeding on cattleMedical and Veterinary Entomology, 2001
- Sheep blowfly strike: a model approachResearch in Veterinary Science, 2000
- Simulation modelling of Aedes aegypti prevalence, an environmental hazard surveillance tool for the control of dengue epidemicsInternational Journal of Environmental Health Research, 1999
- Epidemiology of trypanosome infections of the tsetse fly Glossina pallidipes in the Zambezi ValleyParasitology, 1993
- Suppressive action of Samorin on the cyclical development of pathogenic trypanosomes in Glossina morsitans centralisMedical and Veterinary Entomology, 1987