INACCURACY OF ELECTRONIC SPHYGMOMANOMETERS
- 1 May 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
- Vol. 19 (5) , 304-306
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.1992.tb00458.x
Abstract
1. Eight electronic sphygmomanometers were purchased locally and evaluated for clinical accuracy during blood pressure recording on volunteer patients. 2. Direct comparisons of systolic and diastolic pressure were made in seven devices using a Y-tube connection to a mercury sphygmomanometer, simultaneous measurements being made by a trained observer on 16-18 subjects. 3. Indirect comparisons were made for all eight devices by comparing the average values obtained from all measurements made on each subject by the device with the average value from mercury sphygmomanometric readings made over the same time period. 4. Results were analysed by measuring the mean and standard deviation of the differences between device readings and mercury readings. Published criteria were used to grade the devices. 5. The most accurate machine was the Omron HEM-719K, which used the cuff as a sound sensor and had an internal microphone. The least accurate was the Omron HEM-812F, which used a finger-cuff method. The other devices (all oscillometric) ranged from fair to poor in performance accuracy.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systemsJournal Of Hypertension, 1990
- Inaccuracy of seven popular sphygmomanometers for home measurement of blood pressureJournal Of Hypertension, 1990
- Clinical evaluation of semiautomatic and automatic devices for home blood pressure measurement: comparison between cuff-oscillometric and microphone methodsJournal Of Hypertension, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986