Occupational implications of the chlorofluorocarbon ban in Sweden
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Vol. 19 (6) , 818-826
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700190615
Abstract
Limitations on the use of full halogenated chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) may create occupational environmental problems. These are currently largely unknown, because the toxicology of most CFC substitutes is unknown. Therefore, toxicity testing of CFC substitutes is necessary, and this can best be done before their use commences. Destruction of CFC and materials containing CFC could generate new chemical compounds, especially during incineration. In addition, problems with higher noise and vibration levels may occur when CFC substitutes are employed, and we should keep in mind that occupational environment problems could also develop when new routines are introduced for transporting, storing, and handling new materials.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complete destruction of chlorofluorocarbons by reductive dehalogenation using sodium naphthalenideIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1989
- Carcinogenic and Mutagenic Potential of Several FluorocarbonsaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988
- Long‐Term Carcinogenicity Bioassays on Three Chlorofluorocarbons (Trichlorofluoromethane, FC11; Dichlorodifluoromethane, FC12; Chlorodifluoromethane, FC22) Administered by Inhalation to Sprague‐Dawley Rats and Swiss MiceAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988
- Search Intensifies for Alternatives To Ozone-Depleting HalocarbonsChemical & Engineering News, 1988
- Substitution analysis: A case study of solventsJournal of Hazardous Materials, 1985
- The effects of low frequency noise on people—A reviewJournal of Sound and Vibration, 1978
- Toxicology of Haloalkane Propellants and Fire ExtinguishantsAnnual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1977
- Toxicity of AerosolsThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1975