Experimental analysis of diet specialization in the snail kite: the role of behavioral conservatism
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 100-100 (1-2) , 54-65
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00317130
Abstract
We examined factors maintaining extreme diet specialization in the snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis), a medium-sized hawk which feed almost exclusively on Pomacea snails, by determining why during some months kites eat crabs (Dilocarcinus dentatus) in the Ilanos of Venezuela. We offered snails and crabs of different sizes to wild free-flying birds to develop estimates for a prey choice model. Handling times of Pomacea doliodes snails averaged 90±39 s and were positively correlated with snail size. Handling times for crabs (x=353±130 s) were significantly longer and exhibited greater variation than for snails, and were not correlated with crab size. Edible crab tissues had greater dry weights and contained more energy (25.37 kJ/g) than tissues of snails (16.91 kJ/g). Total energy of crabs was much greater than that of snails, and total energy of both foods was highly related to body length. We constructed an allometric equation for profitability of snails and crabs. Snails were more profitable than all but the largest crabs, but estimates of variance in profitability were greater for crabs. Predictions from the model were tested by offering crabs that represented equal, greater and much greater profitability than snails, to determine whether kites chose prey according to profitability. Only 15.6% of 289 food items chosen were crabs. Half of the 18 kites tested did not eat crabs and only 3 birds switched from snails to more profitable crabs. Four fledglings showed no preference for snails. The role of neophobia in food choice was investigated by offering unfamiliar snails (Pomacea urceus) to kites. Kites exhibited neophobic behaviors, and 5 of 12 birds chose not to capture P. urceus. Two-thirds of the 12 snails chosen were rejected immediately, but the others were handled efficiently (x=133±89 s). Although morphological adaptations allow kites to specialize on snails, the costs of specialization were overcome for kites when the profitability of alternative food increased sufficiently. Our results suggest a role for behavioral conservatism, in the form of risk-averse foraging and neophobia, in maintaining severe diet specialization in the snail kite.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Field tests of micropatch and prey-size selection by Snail Kites Rostrhamus sociabilisIbis, 2008
- Apple Snail (Pomacea doliodes) and Freshwater Crab (Dilocarcinus dentatus) Population Fluctuations in the Llanos of VenezuelaBiotropica, 1993
- Prey Defences and Predator Handling Behaviour: The Dangerous Prey HypothesisOikos, 1989
- Constant vs. Variable Risk‐Aversion in Foraging BananaquitsEcology, 1988
- Six ways in which a foraging predator may encounter options with different variancesBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1987
- Why do animals specialize?Nature, 1987
- The Role of Profitability in Snail Kite ForagingJournal of Animal Ecology, 1985
- Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical ReviewAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1984
- Notes on Nesting Raptors in the Llanos of VenezuelaOrnithological Applications, 1981
- NOTES ON SOME MARSH BIRDS OF CAPE SAN ANTONIO, ARGENTINA*Ibis, 1967