Readability formulas may mislead you
- 30 June 1985
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Patient Education and Counseling
- Vol. 7 (2) , 181-191
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(85)90008-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Producing ‘Considerate’ Expository Text: or Easy Reading is Damned Hard WritingJournal of Curriculum Studies, 1985
- Comparison of consumer-oriented books on medicationsPatient Education and Counseling, 1984
- Comprehension Assessment of Diabetes Education Program ParticipantsDiabetes Care, 1984
- DEALING WITH THE ILLITERATE PATIENT... YOU CANʼT READ HIM LIKE A BOOKNursing2021, 1983
- Readability of Self-Care Instructional Pamphlets for Diabetic PatientsDiabetes Care, 1981
- PATIENTSʼ UNDERSTANDING OF WRITTEN HEALTH INFORMATIONNursing Research, 1964
- A recalculation of four adult readability formulas.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1958
- "Cloze" readability scores as indices of individual differences in comprehension and aptitude.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1957
- Review of Know your reader: the scientific approach to readability.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1955
- A New Readability Formula for Primary-Grade Reading MaterialsThe Elementary School Journal, 1953