Generational Replacement and the Growth of Incumbent Reelection Margins in the U.S. House
- 1 September 1979
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 73 (3) , 811-817
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1955406
Abstract
Virtually all congressional scholars investigating the rise of incumbent safety in the U.S. House have assumed that the responsible cause, regardless of its specific nature, is one which has affected incumbents generally. The sole exception is Fiorina, who speculates that increased overall safety results from recent freshmen's greater electoral strength. The analysis performed here confirms this generational replacement hypothesis. Much greater vote gains have resulted from the freshman term of incumbency since 1966–68, while no pro-incumbent trend for veterans has surfaced.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections, 1964-1974Political Science Quarterly, 1978
- One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1977
- The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did ItAmerican Political Science Review, 1977
- On the Decline of Competition in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1977
- Insulation and Responsiveness in Congressional ElectionsPolitical Science Quarterly, 1975
- Redistricting and Congressional Stability, 1962–72The Journal of Politics, 1975
- [no title]American Political Science Review, 1974
- Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing MarginalsPolity, 1974
- The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party SystemsAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1972