Differences between the deformed-potential and folding-model descriptions of inelastic nuclear scattering
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review C
- Vol. 50 (2) , 1251-1252
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.50.1251
Abstract
The differences between the deformed-potential and folding-model descriptions of inelastic nuclear scattering, attention to which has been called recently by Beene, Horen, and Satchler [Phys. Rev. C 48, 3128 (1993)], were pointed out already some time ago by contrasting the rules of equal deformation lengths and equal normalized multipole moments for the optical potential and the underlying nucleon distribution of the excited nucleus.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Examination of inconsistencies between the deformed potential model and folding models for analysis of inelastic hadron scatteringPhysical Review C, 1993
- A critique of the “implicit folding procedure” for analyzing inelastic hadron scattering measurementsPhysics Letters B, 1993
- On the optical-potential deformation in heavy-ion inelastic scatteringJournal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, 1987
- Folding model potentials from realistic interactions for heavy-ion scatteringPhysics Reports, 1979
- Inelastic scattering of heavy ions from deformed light nuclei at near-barrier energiesNuclear Physics A, 1978
- Potential and charge deformations in light nucleiPhysics Letters B, 1977
- Radial Moments of Folding Integrals for Nonspherical DistributionsJournal of Mathematical Physics, 1972