Comments on Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Europe

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Despite the advances in Western medicine, up to one in three people in populations served by this medical system are seeking some form of unorthodox care each year, and Europe is no exception. Patients have driven this change, to the point where complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is the second biggest growth industry in Europe. Often patients have to rely on the growing numbers of CAM practitioners with a variable standard of care that ranges from excellent to dangerous. Many practitioners work without regulation or even work illegally. Many orthodox health care professionals have shared their patients' concerns. Over the last 15 years, these practitioners have moved from silent interest to open enquiry and growing use. For example, approximately one in five of Scotland's general practitioners have received basic training in integrating homeopathy with orthodox practice. The demand for CAM is in part a search for a broader range of therapies, but is also a call for a different approach to care, with less emphasis on drugs, and a more whole-person approach. Mostly, people look to CAM when orthodoxy has failed. But CAM is also increasingly becoming a first-line intervention for some, because of the worry about the side effects of conventional treatments and a perception that orthodoxy has become dehumanized. With some exceptions, research is still in its early stages and lacks infrastructure. Patient satisfaction, empirical clinical outcome, and cost are beginning to be emphasized over mechanism of action or explanatory models. Recent official reports are calling for national and European-level enquiry and response. Future development is likely to emphasize integrative care. The challenge is to create better medical systems, with a whole-person emphasis, calling on a broader range of approaches than is currently orthodox. We seem to need a reunion of the art and science of medicine.