Comparison of the healing rates and complications of three four-layer bandage regimens
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Mark Allen Group in Journal of Wound Care
- Vol. 9 (6) , 269-272
- https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2000.9.6.25992
Abstract
This randomised controlled study compares the healing rates, complication and patient and staff acceptability of three four-layer bandage regimens for leg ulcers. A total of 149 patients were recruited into the study, of whom 50 received the original Charing Cross system (Parema) and 49 a commerically available kit, Robinson Ultra Four (Robinson). No significant difference was found in the healing rates of the three systems. Overall 12 weeks' healing was 65%, while the 20-week healing rates for the individual systems were 87% (CX4L), 84%(Parema) and 83% (Robinson). Analysis of known risk factors for delayed healing showed that no bandaging systems had an advantage over the others. Staff familiarity resulted in an initial preference for teh CX4L but there was no bandage preference by the end of the study. The data suggest that none of the systems has an advantage over the others and that cost savings can be made by pursuing a competitive pricing policy.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of sub-bandage pressures produced with two multi-layer bandaging systemsJournal of Wound Care, 1999
- Comparative cost-effectiveness of four-layer bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcerationJournal of Wound Care, 1999
- Leg ulcer management in a nurse-led, hospital-based clinicJournal of Wound Care, 1997
- Community leg ulcer clinics: a comparative study in two health authoritiesBMJ, 1996
- Living with a venous leg ulcer: a descriptive study of patients’experiencesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1995
- Community clinics for leg ulcers and impact on healing.BMJ, 1992
- Sustained compression and healing of chronic venous ulcers.BMJ, 1988