Progress Versus Precision: Challenges in Clinical Trial Design for Left Ventricular Assist Devices
- 30 September 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 82 (3) , 1140-1146
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.123
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Same Bridge, New Destinations: Rethinking Paradigms for Mechanical Cardiac Support in Heart FailureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Key Issues in End Point Selection for Heart Failure Trials: Composite End PointsJournal of Cardiac Failure, 2005
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Third Annual Report—2005⁎ ⁎All figures and tables from this report, and a more comprehensive set of ISHLT registry slides are available at www.ishlt.org/registries/The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2005
- Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: A new look at survivalThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2005
- Left Ventricular Assist Device Performance With Long-Term Circulatory Support: Lessons From the REMATCH TrialThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Permanent Heart Failure TherapyAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Long-Term Use of a Left Ventricular Assist Device for End-Stage Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- The Evaluation of Multiple Clinical Endpoints, with Application to AsthmaDrug Information Journal, 1999
- Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support System Reliability Recommendation American Society for Artificial Internal Organs and Society of Thoracic SurgeonsAsaio Journal, 1998
- “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1982