Should Renal Ultrasound be Performed in Patient with Microscopic Hematuria and Normal Excretory Urogram?
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 154 (4) , 1300-1301
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66841-1
Abstract
We determine what additional information would be detected by renal ultrasonography that was not identified by a normal excretory urogram (IVP) performed for the evaluation of microscopic hematuria. A retrospective review was done of 101 patients with microscopic hematuria and a normal IVP who underwent renal ultrasonography. Of the 101 patients with microscopic hematuria and a normal IVP, renal ultrasonography was abnormal in 20 percent. All findings were ultimately proved to be of no clinical significance, although 6 of 21 patients required a total of 10 additional studies, including 9 computerized tomography scans and 1 renal arteriogram. These data demonstrate that renal ultrasonography is unnecessary in a patient with microscopic hematuria and a normal IVP.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasonography versus Intravenous Urography In the Evaluation of Patients with Microscopic HaematuriaBritish Journal of Urology, 1990
- Renal Carcinomas Missed by UrographyBritish Journal of Urology, 1989
- Small renal neoplasms: diagnostic imaging, pathologic features, and clinical course.Radiology, 1986
- Normal excretory urography in patients with primary kidney neoplasmsUrologic Radiology, 1985
- Renal malignancies with normal excretory urogramsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1983
- Pitfalls in diagnosis of exophytic renal tumorsUrology, 1982
- Small Renal Adenocarcinoma with MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1980
- Renal adenoma — a misnomerUrology, 1979