Poor-Quality Medical Research

Top Cited Papers

5 June 2002

journal article
editorial
Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA

Vol. 287 (21) , 2765-2767
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2765

Abstract

The aim of medical research is to advance scientific knowledge and hence—directly or indirectly—lead to improvements in the treatment and prevention of disease. Each research project should continue systematically from previous research and feed into future research. Each project should contribute beneficially to a slowly evolving body of research. A study should not mislead; otherwise it could adversely affect clinical practice and future research. In 1994 I observed that research papers commonly contain methodological errors, report results selectively, and draw unjustified conclusions. Here I revisit the topic and suggest how journal editors can help.

Keywords

This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:

Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.
JAMA, 2002
How Statistical Expertise Is Used in Medical Research
JAMA, 2002
Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography
The Lancet, 2001
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2001
The effectiveness of exercise as an intervention in the management of depression: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials
BMJ, 2001
Content and Quality of Currently Published Phase II Cancer Trials
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1997
Review of statistics usage in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
The use of Statistics in the British Journal of Psychiatry
The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1995
The scandal of poor medical research
BMJ, 1994