Jamming
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Communication Research
- Vol. 17 (2) , 139-164
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017002001
Abstract
Modern communication theory focuses to a disproportionate degree on the cultivation of shared meanings, interpretations, and emotions, and insufficiently on how coordinated action may occur under conditions of minimal self-disclosure and limited consensus. Borrowing a term from music and sports, this article describes characteristics of “jamming” experiences, instances of fluid behavioral coordination that occur without detailed knowledge of personality. Two biases in prior work—individual bias and strong culture bias—are cited as reasons why experiences like jamming have been ignored in the literature. Examples are given of how these experiences strike a balance between autonomy and interdependence, and can even be transcendent. Four preconditions for jamming—skill, structure, setting, and surrender— are also provided. Finally, possibilities for jamming in formal organizations and society are explored.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Jazz as a Process of Organizational InnovationCommunication Research, 1988
- Optimal ExperiencePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1988
- What's Wrong With This Picture?Communication Research, 1988
- Communication, Meaning, and Organized ActionAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1986
- Meaning and interpretation in organizationsQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1986
- Liturgy, Ambiguity and Silence: The Ritual Management of Real AbsenceBritish Journal of Sociology, 1985
- The social constructionist movement in modern psychology.American Psychologist, 1985
- COORIENTATION ON COMMUNICATION RULES IN MANAGERIAL DYADSHuman Communication Research, 1984
- Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communicationCommunication Monographs, 1984
- Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization TheoryAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983