Is there a strong rationale for deferring elective surgery in patients with poorly controlled hypertension?
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Hypertension
- Vol. 23 (1) , 19-22
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200501000-00005
Abstract
Hypertension remains one of the most common avoidable medical indications for deferring elective surgery, thereby increasing both the financial and emotional burden of having an operation. Although the evidence supporting the current guidelines on management of hypertension is among the best available in any field of medicine, our knowledge on whether high blood pressure (BP) is an independent perioperative risk factor is plagued by much uncertainty. Indeed, it is still unclear whether postponing surgery on the ground of elevated preoperative BP measurements will lead to a reduction in perioperative cardiac risk. Similarly, the importance of multiple versus isolated BP measurements in predicting perioperative complications has not yet been assessed. As most studies have evaluated the predictive value of diastolic BP, the risk of perioperative cardiovascular events associated with isolated systolic hypertension remains uncertain. With no controlled evidence to address these issues, no firm recommendations can be made to improve patients' safety. These important issues now need to be addressed by modern clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureThe JNC 7 ReportJAMA, 2003
- Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)JAMA, 2002
- Effects of Losartan on Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Isolated Systolic Hypertension and Left Ventricular HypertrophyJAMA, 2002
- Survey of cancellation rate of hypertensive patients undergoing anaesthesia and elective surgeryBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001
- Prospective Evaluation of Cardiac Risk Indices for Patients Undergoing Noncardiac SurgeryAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)The Lancet, 2000
- Preoperative Assessment of Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological contextPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution biasPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- Why are operations cancelled?BMJ, 1989