Assessment of impact of information booklets on use of healthcare services: randomised controlled trial Commentary: What's wrong with opting out? Commentary: Public opinion may force researchers to seek "opt in" consent for all
- 19 May 2001
- Vol. 322 (7296) , 1218
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1218
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the effect of patient information booklets on overall use of health services, on particular types of use, and on possible interactions between use, deprivation category of the area in which respondents live, and age. To investigate the possibility of a differential effect on health service use between two information booklets. Design: Randomised controlled trial of two patient information booklets (covering the management and treatment of minor illness). Setting: 20 general practices in Lothian, Scotland. Participants: Random sample of patients from the community health index (n=4878) and of those contacting out of hours services (n=4530) in the previous 12 months in each of the study general practices. Intervention: Booklets were posted to participants in intervention groups (3288 were sent What Should I Do?; 3127 were sent Health Care Manual). Patients randomised to control group (2993) did not receive a booklet. Main outcome measures: Use of health services audited from patients' general practice notes in 12 months after receipt of booklet. Results: Receipt of either booklet had no significant effect on health service use compared with a control group. However, nine out of ten matched practices allocated to receive Health Care Manual had reduced consultation rates compared with matched practices allocated to What Should I Do? Conclusion: Widespread distribution of information booklets about the management of minor illness is unlikely to reduce demand for health services. What is already known on this topic What is already known on this topic One view of help seeking behaviour is that increasing demand for health services is associated with a lack of knowledge in the self management of minor illness An alternative view sees individuals responding reflexively to symptoms on the basis of information and advice from a wide range of sources and using their own experiences What this study adds What this study adds The lack of effect on health service use indicates that widespread postal distribution of information booklets about the management of minor illness is unlikely to reduce demand for health servicesKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient education literature and help seeking behaviour: perspectives from an evaluation in the United KingdomSocial Science & Medicine, 2000
- Self help programme for anxiety in general practice: controlled trial of an anxiety management booklet.1991
- Development and randomized controlled trial of a booklet of advice for parents.1991
- Baby Check: a scoring system to grade the severity of acute systemic illness in babies under 6 months old.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1991
- Field trials of the Baby Check score card: mothers scoring their babies at home.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1991
- Randomized controlled trial of an educational booklet for patients presenting with back pain in general practice.1989
- A randomized controlled trial of an information booklet for hypertensive patients in general practice.1987
- Teaching parents about child health using a practice booklet.1980
- Management of minor illness.BMJ, 1980
- Ethics and Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966