Public Administration or Public Implementation
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Public Policy and Administration
- Vol. 5 (2) , 5-29
- https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679000500202
Abstract
This paper argues that a number of contemporary factors conspire to place the study of public administration in Britain in a peculiarly critical condition. In the first place public administration as a discipline contains within itself inherent weaknesses which are unique to it. In addition, the past 20 years have seen the development of certain intellectual fashions which necessarily threaten the discipline and its characteristic paradigm. All is made more acute by a scepticism towards social democracy felt throughout the western world but reaching an apotheosis in Britain. Here we have experienced the catalytic presence of a Government with a propensity to see public administration in simplistic instrumental terms: that is, as a machine for implementation of the "can do" kind. Thus the discipline suffers from a deep malaise compounded by an increasingly inhospitable climate.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citizenship and Government: The Challenge for Management in the Public DomainPolitical Studies, 1989
- Whitehall and the Civil ServicePublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- CONSERVATISM IS NOT ENOUGHThe Political Quarterly, 1984
- Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 3Published by University of Chicago Press ,1979
- Social Equity, Justice, and the Equitable AdministratorPublic Administration Review, 1974
- The Fiscal Crisis of the StatePublished by Springer Nature ,1973
- A Pure Theory of Local ExpendituresJournal of Political Economy, 1956