No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews
Open Access
- 22 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 264 (1387) , 1497-1500
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0207
Abstract
There is currently much interest in the suggestion that females are capable of post–copulatory (or cryptic) choice for male genetic compatibility. Here, I investigate this idea using data from mixed–paternity litters of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Females of this species are highly promiscuous and, in natural populations, regularly incur costs of inbreeding by mating with close relatives. Selection should therefore favour female ability for sperm selection on the basis of male relatedness. No evidence was found in support of this idea. Relative number of offspring sired within mixed paternity litters was not significantly correlated with genetic similarity of males to the female mated. Relative fertilization success was, however, significantly related to male epididymal sperm counts. I conclude that most variation in relative fertilization success of male common shrews can be explained in terms of sperm competition, and that females of this species may not be capable of sperm selection.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sperm selection by femalesTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1997
- Synchrony of Estrus in Common ShrewsJournal of Mammalogy, 1996
- Mate choice and maternal selection for specific parasite resistances before, during and after fertilizationPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1994
- Crossing Distance Effects on Prezygotic Performance in Plants: An Argument for Female ChoiceOikos, 1993
- Natal Dispersal and Social Dominance in the Common Shrew Sorex araneusOikos, 1991
- Evidence for Multiple Paternity in the Common Shrew (Sorex araneus)Journal of Mammalogy, 1990
- Energy requirements during reproduction and reproductive effort in shrews (Soricidae)Journal of Zoology, 1990
- Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNANature, 1985
- Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTSBiological Reviews, 1970