Moving from "Small Qa" to "Large Qa"
- 29 June 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation & the Health Professions
- Vol. 14 (2) , 138-160
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016327879101400202
Abstract
In this article we describe an "outcomes framework" for planning and analyzing quality management systems in relation to their ultimate purpose, enhancing the wide range of health care benefits. "Small qa" includes those methods that focus on structure or process and induce improvement of outcomes. These methods are essential but, predictably, often involve minimal improvement of health care. "LARGE QA " is defined as those methods that focus on unacceptable outcomes and deduce processes and structures to be changed to enhance outcomes. These methods focus on either "problems" or "opportunities" that predict substantial improvement in health care benefits. We briefly describe and analyze this outcomes framework for quality management in terms of its conceptual factors and its current and future emphasis. We then describe several major nationalprogram developments and resources that will facilitate moving the balance of quality management effort from small qa to LARGE QA.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Clinical Practice Guidelines at an HMO: Development and Implementation in a Quality Improvement ModelQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1990
- Reliability and Validity of Judgments Concerning Adverse Events Suffered by Hospitalized PatientsMedical Care, 1989
- The information analyst as a quality filter in the scientific communication processJournal of Information Science, 1989
- Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Outcomes ManagementNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Evaluating Quality of Patient CareJAMA, 1971
- Continuing Education and Patient Care ResearchJAMA, 1967