A Comparison of Three Different Methods for the Determination of Estrogen Receptors in Human Breast Cancer
Open Access
- 1 November 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 90 (5) , 583-590
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/90.5.583
Abstract
Forty-seven cases of breast cancer were analyzed for estrogen receptors (ERs) by three different techniques: (1) a biochemical assay using isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel; (2) a monoclonal ER immunocytochemical assay (ERICA®, Abbott Laboratories Diagnostics Division), and (3) a polyclonal antiestradiol immunohistochemical technique using formalin-fixed tissue. A high level of agreement (85%) was noted between the biochemical assay and ERICA. The ERICA-processed slides showed minimal background staining and were easy to interpret. Compared with the biochemical assay, ERICA achieved a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 82%. In contrast, results from the polyclonal antiestradiol histologic technique did not correlate with biochemical results and showed positive and negative predictive values of 61% and 25%, respectively. The authors conclude that the ERICA technique should prove to be a valuable adjunct to traditional biochemical ER assays.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Immunohistologic detection of estrogen receptors in paraffin-embedded breast cancersHuman Pathology, 1986
- PAP immunoperoxidase method demonstrating endogenous estrogen in breast carcinomasCancer, 1983
- Estrogen Receptors in Carcinoma of the Breast. A Comparison of the Dextran-coated Charcoal, Immunofluorescent, and Immunoperoxidase TechnicsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1983
- The presence of a second, specific estrogen binding site in human breast cancerJournal of Steroid Biochemistry, 1981
- HISTOLOGICAL DETECTION OF ŒSTROGEN RECEPTOR IN HUMAN BREAST CARCINOMASThe Lancet, 1980