Comparison of durability of bioprostheses in tricuspid and mitral positions
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 71 (5) , S240-S243
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02557-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical strategy for severe tricuspid valve regurgitation complicated by advanced mitral valve disease: Long-term outcome of tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation in eighty-eight casesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2000
- Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: a 21-year experienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- The Hancock II bioprosthesis at 12 yearsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves in the mitral position: Ten-year follow-upThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Ten-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenograft in the tricuspid positionThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid positionThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1990
- Biological versus mechanical valvesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1987
- Comparison of late (62 to 140 months) degenerative changes in simultaneously implanted and explanted mitral valve positions in six patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Surgery for Acquired Valvular Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973