Comparison of Three Doses of Oral Ciramadol and Placebo for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Postoperative Pain
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 22 (10) , 459-465
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1982.tb02635.x
Abstract
Ciramadol, 20, 40, or 60 mg, or a placebo was administered orally, double blind, to patients complaining of moderate (N = 89) or severe (N = 80) postoperative pain to determine the lowest effective dose. The highest dose used for moderate pain, 40 mg, was statistically more effective than placebo as measured by pain intensity differences and pain relief scores. The highest dose used to treat severe pain, 60 mg, was also more effective statistically than placebo and the lower doses of ciramadol at certain points during the 6‐hour observation period. Drowsiness was minimal, and side effects were infrequent and mild in intensity. We conclude that 40 mg ciramadol for moderate postoperative pain and 60 mg ciramadol for severe postoperative pain would be the minimal oral doses to compare with standard analgesics in future studies.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Double-blind comparison of the analgesic response to oral ciramadol (WY-15.705) and pentazocine in post-operative painEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- Analgesic effect of ciramadol in patients with chronic painCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 1980
- CIRAMADOLThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1979
- RESPIRATORY EFFECTS OF 1-CIS-2-(A-DIMETHYLAMINO-M-HYDROXYBENZYL) CYCLOHEXANOL-HCL AND PENTAZOCINE IN MAN1979
- Average Partial Association in Three-Way Contingency Tables: A Review and Discussion of Alternative TestsInternational Statistical Review, 1978
- A potent benzylamine analgesic:(−)cis-2(α-dimethylamino-m-hydroxybenzyl)cyclohexanolCellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1978