Review of Rapid Molecular Diagnostic Tools for Avian Influenza Virus
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association of Avian Pathologists (AAAP) in Avian Diseases
- Vol. 51 (s1) , 201-208
- https://doi.org/10.1637/7732-101006-regr.1
Abstract
Molecular diagnostic tests are commonly used to diagnose avian influenza virus because they are sensitive and can be performed rapidly, with high throughput, and at a moderate cost. Molecular diagnostic tests recently have proven themselves to be invaluable in controlling disease outbreaks around the world. Several different methods, including traditional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification among others, have been described for the diagnosis of avian influenza in poultry with many different variations of primers, probes, enzymes, etc. Few of these tests have been validated, with the understanding that validation should be described as a level of comparison testing to show “fitness for purpose.” None of the molecular diagnostic tests are validated for all species or specimen types that might be presented to a diagnostic laboratory. The sensitivity and specificity for all the molecular tests are governed by three critical control points, including RNA extraction, enzymes used for amplification, and the sequence of primers and probes. The RNA extraction step is of particular concern, since high-quality RNA is needed for any of the molecular tests. Some sample types, including cloacal (fecal) swabs and tissues, are difficult to process, with issues of poor RNA extraction or PCR inhibitors being common. The development of internal controls, robotics, and bead reagents are providing improved performance of existing tests, and new technologies will likely provide better tests for the future. With any molecular test, assay assurance must be performed on an ongoing basis, which includes the use of proficiency panels to measure test performance.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of an Internal Positive Control for Rapid Diagnosis of Avian Influenza Virus Infections by Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR with Lyophilized ReagentsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Multicenter Comparison of Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus RNA in Stool SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Review of the highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreak in Texas, 2004Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2006
- Commercial Immunoassay Kits for the Detection of Influenza Virus Type A: Evaluation of Their Use with PoultryAvian Diseases, 2005
- Comparison of three rapid detection systems for type A influenza virus on tracheal swabs of experimentally and naturally infected birdsAvian Pathology, 2004
- PUNS: transcriptomic- and genomic-in silico PCR for enhanced primer designBioinformatics, 2004
- Application and Evaluation of RT-PCR—ELISA for the Nucleoprotein and RT-PCR for Detection of Low-Pathogenic H5 and H7 Subtypes of Avian Influenza VirusJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 2004
- Development of a Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for Type A Influenza Virus and the Avian H5 and H7 Hemagglutinin SubtypesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Combined PCR-Heteroduplex Mobility Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Influenza A Viruses from Different Animal SpeciesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Comparison of four RNA extraction methods for the detection of small round structured viruses in faecal specimensJournal of Virological Methods, 1996