Commercial Immunoassay Kits for the Detection of Influenza Virus Type A: Evaluation of Their Use with Poultry
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association of Avian Pathologists (AAAP) in Avian Diseases
- Vol. 49 (4) , 477-481
- https://doi.org/10.1637/7357-031605r.1
Abstract
Five antigen capture immunoassay test kits, Directigen Flu A (Becton Dickinson), QuickVue Influenza test kit (Quidel), FLU OIA (ThermoBiostar), Zstat Flu (ZymeTx, Inc.) and NOW FLU A Test (Binax) were used to detect avian influenza virus (AIV) in clinical specimens as per manufacturers' protocols. Each kit was shown to be specific for AIV propagated in embryonating chicken eggs (ECE); other respiratory viruses of poultry tested gave negative results. The Directigen Flu A kit proved to be 10-fold more sensitive than the other kits, capable of detecting 10(4.7) mean embryo lethal dose (ELD50)/ml in allantoic fluid; this is more sensitive than the hemagglutination test using chicken erythrocytes. None of the kits proved to be sufficiently sensitive to reliably detect AIV in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs collected from chickens experimentally infected with AIV subtype H6N2. In two different experiments, individual swabs and pools of five or six swabs were tested. By virus isolation, 39 individual oropharyngeal swabs tested positive for AIV, but Directigen and Flu OIA only detected 2/39 and NOW FLU A 1/39. Zstat and QuickVue did not detect any. Five individual cloacal swabs positive by virus isolation were negative with all five kits. In a second experiment using pools of five swabs, 26 swab pools were positive by virus isolation and 5/26 were positive by Directigen, the only kit to provide any positive results. Five cloacal swab pools were also positive by virus isolation and 1/5 was positive by Directigen; all other test kits were negative. All of these experiments were performed using the H6N2 subtype of AIV. The results are disappointing, as the kits have proven to be insensitive for detecting AIV when compared with the gold standard, virus isolation. This limits their use in diagnostic field investigations. Individual or groups of chickens could be assumed to be positive for AIV if positive by any of the kits, but a negative result with any of the kits would not prove that birds were AIV free.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Binax NOW and Directigen for rapid detection of influenza A and BJournal of Clinical Virology, 2004
- Comparison of the Directigen Flu A+B Membrane Enzyme Immunoassay with Viral Culture for Rapid Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses in Respiratory SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Comparison of Sensitivities of Virus Isolation, Antigen Detection, and Nucleic Acid Amplification for Detection of Equine Influenza VirusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Low-Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus (H6N2) in Chickens in California, 2000–02Avian Diseases, 2003
- The Occurrence of Avian Influenza A Subtype H6N2 in Commercial Layer Flocks in Southern California (2000–02): Clinicopathologic FindingsAvian Diseases, 2003
- Comparison of the Directigen Flu A+B Test, the QuickVue Influenza Test, and Clinical Case Definition to Viral Culture and Reverse Transcription-PCR for Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza Virus InfectionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Clinical Evaluation of the ZstatFlu-II Test: a Chemiluminescent Rapid Diagnostic Test for Influenza VirusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Evaluation of the Directigen FluA+B Test for Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza Virus Type A and B InfectionsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- A flu optical immunoassay (ThermoBioStar'sFLU OIA): a diagnostic tool for improved influenza managementPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2001
- Evaluation of Directigen Flu A assay for detection of influenza antigen in nasal secretions of horsesEquine Veterinary Journal, 1995