Enhancing Girls’ Learning Through Single-Sex Education: Evidence and a Policy Conundrum
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
- Vol. 11 (2) , 117-142
- https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011002117
Abstract
A key consideration in the policy debate on the appropriate role of single-sex education in predominantly coeducational school systems is relative benefit for male and female students. This paper analyzes the relative performance of single-sex education and coeducation in Thailand in enhancing eighth-grade male and female student scores on standardized mathematics tests, holding constant student background, peer, and school characteristics. Its main conclusions are that (a) single-sex schooling is more effective for female students and coeducational schooling is more effective for male students in improving student performance in mathematics and (b) these differentials are largely due to peer effects rather than to specific characteristics of single-sex and coeducational classrooms or schools.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Girls' Academic Achievements: Single-Sex Versus Coeducational Schools in AustraliaSociology of Education, 1987
- Effects of single-sex secondary schools on student achievement and attitudes.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1986
- Single-Sex Schooling and Girls' Academic AchievementsJournal of Sociology, 1985
- Science in single‐sex and mixed teaching groupsEducational Research, 1985
- Performance levels in science and other subjects for Jamaican adolescents attending single‐sex and co‐educational high schoolsScience Education, 1985
- Sex differences in educational outcomes: A cross-national studySex Roles, 1980
- ThailandPublished by Elsevier ,1980
- Using Panel Data to Improve Estimates of the Determinants of Educational AchievementSociology of Education, 1979
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification ErrorEconometrica, 1979
- Coeducation and adolescent values.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972