Sample homogeneity, Response skewness and acquiescence: A reply to feather
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 33 (1) , 41-46
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538108255290
Abstract
Feather (1980) claims that the low correlation between the positive and negative halves of the C‐scale reported in an earlier paper may have been due to the homogeneity of the samples used. It is pointed out that (a) even highly skewed C‐scale items do still, on at least some occasions, correlate well with other items: (b) low pos‐neg correlations are sometimes in the C‐scal associated with generally high levels of inter‐item correlatin; (c) the C‐scal does not collapse when applied to other homogeneous samples: and (d) the demographic homogeneity of the Ray and Pratt (1979) “homogeneours” samples was not associated with response homogeneity. It is concluded that Feather's suggested explanatinon for the occasioanal poor functioning of the C‐scale is contra‐indicated by such considerations.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conservatism, acquiescence, and the effects of sample heterogeneityAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1980
- Acquiescence and the Wilson conservatism scalePersonality and Individual Differences, 1980
- Is the influence of acquiescence on “catchphrase” type attitude scale items not so mythical after all?Australian Journal of Psychology, 1979
- Wilson and Patterson's Conservatism Scale: A shortened alternative formBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1978
- ‘A New Measure of Conservatism’: its LimitationsBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1971
- Using Balanced Scales to Control AcquiescenceSociometry, 1970
- A New Measure of Conservatism*British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1968