Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring: Does It Belong In Low-Risk Births?
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing
- Vol. 21 (6) , 301-306
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-199611000-00016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uncertain Value of Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Predicting Cerebral PalsyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birthAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Fetal Health Surveillance in LabourJournal SOGC, 1995
- To the Editor:Birth, 1994
- Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Clinical Issues in Electronic Fetal MonitoringBirth, 1994
- ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION: CONTROVERSIES IN ELECTRONIC FETAL MONITORING Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring During labor: Information from Randomized TrialsBirth, 1994
- Intrapartum Cardiotocography and the Expert WitnessAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Responses of laboring women to fetal heart rate monitoring A critical review of the literatureJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1988
- A Prospective Comparison of Selective and Universal Electronic Fetal Monitoring in 34,995 PregnanciesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986