Routine evaluation of the nonradiometric BACTEC NR 660 system
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 26-29
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.24.1.26-29.1986
Abstract
The present study compares the sensitivity, accuracy, and practicability of a nonradiometric blood culture system with those of the standard blood culture system in use in our laboratory. A total of 1,080 sets of four blood cultures bottles were compared, giving 143 positive aerobic-medium associations and 139 positive anaerobic-medium associations. The conventional system recovered 171 isolates, whereas the BACTEC NR 660 system (Johnston Laboratories, Towson, Md.) recovered 155 isolated. There were no significant differences in total isolates with either system (P more than 0.05). The BACTEC NR 660 system recovered a slightly lower number of Serratia marcescens and Streptococcus faecalis but a higher number of Pneumococcus spp. The mean detection times were 55.9 h with the conventional system and 31.6 h with the BACTEC NR 660 system (P less than 0.001). Our results demonstrate that the BACTEC NR 660 system is suitable for routine use.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture systemJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1985
- Antibacterial activity in blood culturesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1985
- The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemiaPublished by Elsevier ,1983
- Blood culture cross contamination associated with a radiometric analyzerJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1982
- Radiometric detection of bacteremia in neonates.1974
- Evaluation of radiometric system for detecting bacteremia.1973
- Automated detection of Haemophilus influenzae.1973
- Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia.1969