An automatic means to discriminate between earthquakes and quarry blasts
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- Published by Seismological Society of America (SSA) in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
- Vol. 80 (6B) , 2143-2160
- https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa08006b2143
Abstract
In this article we discuss our efforts to use the NORESS array to discriminate between regional earthquakes and ripple-fired quarry blasts (events that involve a number of subexplosions closely grouped in space and time). The method we describe is an extension of the time versus frequency “pattern-based” discriminant proposed by Hedlin et al. (1989b). At the heart of the discriminant is the observation that ripple-fired events tend to give rise to coda dominated by prominent spectral features that are independent of time and periodic in frequency. This spectral character is generally absent from the coda produced by earthquakes and “single-event” explosions. The discriminant originally proposed by Hedlin et al. (1989b) used data collected at 250 sec−1 by single sensors in the 1987 NRDC network in Kazakhstan, U.S.S.R. We have found that despite the relatively low digitization rate provide by the NORESS array (40 sec−1) we have had good success in our efforts to discriminate between earthquakes and quarry blasts by stacking all vertical array channels to improve signal-to-noise ratios. We describe our efforts to automate the method, so that visual pattern recognition is not required, and to make it less susceptible to spurious time-independent spectral features not originating at the source. In essence, we compute a Fourier transform of the time-frequency matrix and examine the power levels representing energy that is periodic in frequency and independent of time. Since a double Fourier transform is involved, our method can be considered as an extension of “cepstral” analysis (Tribolet, 1979). We have found, however, that our approach is superior since it is cognizant of the time independence of the spectral features of interest. We use earthquakes to define what cepstral power is to be expected in the absence of ripple firing and search for events that violate this limit. The assessment of the likelihood that ripple firing occurred at the source is made automatically by the computer and is based on the extent to which the limit is violated.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-frequency seismic observations in eastern Kazakhstan, USSR, with emphasis on chemical explosion experimentsPublished by American Geophysical Union (AGU) ,1990
- Regional seismic event location with a sparse network: Application to eastern Kazakhstan, USSRJournal of Geophysical Research, 1989
- The time-frequency characteristics of quarry blasts and calibration explosions recorded in Kazakhstan, USSRGeophysical Journal International, 1989
- Spectral evidence for source multiplicity in explosions: Application to regional discrimination of earthquakes and explosionsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988
- Experimental confirmation of superposition from small-scale explosionsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988
- Multitaper spectral analysis of high‐frequency seismogramsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1987
- Geology of NRDC seismic station sites in eastern Kazakhstan, USSRPublished by US Geological Survey ,1987
- Seismic noise in Fennoscandia, with emphasis on high frequenciesBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1985
- Linear Prediction of SpeechPublished by Springer Nature ,1976
- Statistics of ExtremesPublished by Columbia University Press ,1958