The Pros and Cons of Diagnosing Diabetes With A1C
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 22 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 34 (Supplement) , S184-S190
- https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-s216
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A1C Between 5.7 and 6.4% as a Marker for Identifying Pre-Diabetes, Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion, and Cardiovascular Risk FactorsDiabetes Care, 2010
- Glycated Hemoglobin, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Risk in Nondiabetic AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006Diabetes Care, 2010
- Moving to an A1C-Based Diagnosis of Diabetes Has a Different Impact on Prevalence in Different Ethnic GroupsDiabetes Care, 2009
- Performance of an A1C and Fasting Capillary Blood Glucose Test for Screening Newly Diagnosed Diabetes and Pre-Diabetes Defined by an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Qingdao, ChinaDiabetes Care, 2009
- A1C Cut Points to Define Various Glucose Intolerance Groups in Asian IndiansDiabetes Care, 2009
- Comparison of A1C and Fasting Glucose Criteria to Diagnose Diabetes Among U.S. AdultsDiabetes Care, 2009
- International Expert Committee Report on the Role of the A1C Assay in the Diagnosis of DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2009
- Stabilization of Glucose in Blood Samples: Why It MattersClinical Chemistry, 2009
- Differences in A1C by Race and Ethnicity Among Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention ProgramDiabetes Care, 2007