Specialization, Fragmentation, Integration, Discipline, Profession: What is the Real Issue?
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quest
- Vol. 39 (1) , 56-64
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1987.10483856
Abstract
This paper discusses various issues related to the fragmentation and specialization debate by attempting to identify critical factors that have contributed to the present knowledge structure of physical education. Two major factors are considered in depth: (a) lack of a clearly defined knowledge structure, and (b) vertical development of independent subdisciplines that have been guided and dominated by the parent disciplines. The first involves conceptual identification and agreement about subject matter, while the second involves the proliferation of independent specialties, each striving for academic respectability. After careful consideration of the issues, fragmentation is viewed as the underlying problem, and a horizontal cross-disciplinary approach is suggested as a possible solution.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Specialization + Fragmentation = ExterminationJournal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 1985
- Unresolved Tensions in College Physical Education—Constructive and DestructiveQuest, 1985
- The Long Green LineQuest, 1985
- Philosophic Processes and the Study of Human MovingQuest, 1985
- Beyond Arrogance and Ad Hominem: A Reply to Hal LawsonQuest, 1980
- Beyond Teaching and Ad Hocracy: Increasing the Sphere of Influence and Control for Physical EducationistsQuest, 1980
- The Crossdisciplinary Structure of Kinesiology and Sports Studies: Distinctions, Implications, and AdvantagesQuest, 1979
- 2001: The Profession is Dead—Was It Murder or Suicide?Quest, 1979
- The Structure of Knowledge of Physical EducationQuest, 1967
- Toward A Discipline: First Steps FirstQuest, 1964