Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Discourse Studies
- Vol. 1 (1) , 83-118
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005
Abstract
Austrian immigration authorities frequently reject the family reunion applications of immigrant workers. They justify their decisions not only on legal grounds but also on the basis of their own often prejudiced judgements of the applicants' ability to `integrate' into Austrian society. A discourse-historical method is combined with systemic-functionally oriented methods of text analysis to study the official letters which notify immigrant workers of the rejection of their family reunion applications. The systemic-functionally oriented methods are used in a detailed analysis of a sample of rejection letters while the discourse-historical method allows this analysis to be intertextually connected to other related genres of discourse and strategies of argumentation, and to the history of post-war immigration in Austria generally.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- IdeologyPublished by Wiley ,2016
- Discourse in social changePublished by Taylor & Francis ,2013
- Time in discourseLinguistics and the Human Sciences, 2005
- “There was a Problem, and it was Solved!”: Legitimating the Expulsion of `Illegal' Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary DiscourseDiscourse & Society, 1997
- Representing Social ActionDiscourse & Society, 1995
- Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis: A SynopsisDiscourse & Society, 1993
- `We are Dealing with People Whose Origins One can Clearly Tell Just by Looking': Critical Discourse Analysis and the Study of Neo-Racism in Contemporary AustriaDiscourse & Society, 1993
- Prejudice in DiscoursePublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,1984