Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Typologies are Misleading
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Statistician
- Vol. 47 (1) , 65-72
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475938
Abstract
The psychophysicist S.S. Stevens developed a measurement scale typology that has dominated social statistics methodology for almost 50 years. During this period, it has generated considerable controversy among statisticians. Recently, there has been a renaissance in the use of Stevens's scale typology for guiding the design of statistical computer packages. The current use of Stevens's terminology fails to deal with the classical criticisms at the time it was proposed and ignores important developments in data analysis over the last several decades.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Level of MeasurementSociological Methods & Research, 1980
- Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- What is Not What in StatisticsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1977
- A New Model for Scaling Response Patterns: An Application of the Quasi-Independence ConceptJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1975
- Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental DataJournal of Marketing Research, 1971
- A General Nonmetric Technique for Finding the Smallest Coordinate Space for a Configuration of PointsPsychometrika, 1968
- Weak Measurements vs. Strong Statistics: An Empirical Critique of S. S. Stevens' Proscriptions nn StatisticsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1966
- Efficient Utilization of Non-Numerical Information in Quantitative Analysis General Theory and the Case of Simple OrderThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1963
- Scales and statistics: Parametric and nonparametric.Psychological Bulletin, 1961
- The Use of TransformationsPublished by JSTOR ,1947