An evaluation by bioassay of the persistence of DDT deposits on riverine vegetation in the Northern Guinea Savannah vegetation Zone of Nigeria and observations on the factors influencing the availability of deposits to Glossina palpalis (R.-D.)

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The persistence of DDT deposits, derived from dilutions of an emulsion concentrate, Arkotine D.25, on the leaves of riverine vegetation in the Northern Guinea Savannah vegetation zone of Nigeria was studied in the laboratory by a bioassay method using teneral females of Glossina palpalis (R.-D.) as test insects. Irrespective of whether sprayed in the dry or wet season, deposits derived from sprays containing 5.0 per cent. DDT produced by the Warley knapsack sprayer were still reasonably toxic one year after spraying. Deposits derived from sprays having a concentration of DDT varying from 1·25 to 5·0 per cent. DDT were equally toxic when young, but those from the lower concentrations were weathered much more rapidly than those from the 5·0 per cent, sprays. Young deposits produced by Warley and Motoblo sprayers were equally toxic, but deposits from the Motoblo deteriorated more rapidly than those of the Warley.The toxicity of the DDT deposits on leaves varied regularly with the seasons. The various climatic factors that it is thought influenced the variations in toxicity are discussed. Accumulations of wind-blown dust on the leaves during the late dry season and low evaporation rates at the height of the rains appear to be responsible for reduced toxicity at those times; in the early wet season, the occasional violent storm probably washes off the leaves the dust accumulated during the dry season and makes the insecticidal deposits once more available. Heavy rainfall is important in removing the insecticidal deposits from the vegetation, and leaf decay and refoliation are important in reducing the availability of the deposits. The implications of these variations in toxicity and factors that reduce the availability of the deposits are discussed in relation to the eradication of riverine tsetse.Great differences in the rates of foliage decay and refoliation occur between different riverine plants, and it is suggested that a thorough study of this feature in riverine plants and of resting sites favoured by tsetse flies might reveal information that would enable tsetse to be eradicated by selective spraying of certain plant species only.