Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T
Open Access
- 30 September 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 52 (10) , 3132-3136
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21348
Abstract
Objective Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage represents a powerful tool in osteoarthritis (OA) research, but has so far been confined to a field strength of 1.5T. The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of quantitative MRI assessments of human cartilage morphology at 3.0T and to correlate the measurements at 3.0T with validated measurements at 1.5T. Methods MR images of the knee of 15 participants with OA and 15 healthy control subjects were acquired using Siemens 1.5T and 3.0T scanners. Double oblique coronal scans were obtained at 1.5T with a 1.5‐mm partition thickness, at 3.0T with a 1.5‐mm partition thickness, and at 3.0T with a 1.0‐mm partition thickness. Cartilage volume, thickness, and surface area of the femorotibial cartilage plates were quantified using proprietary software. Results For 1.5‐mm partition thickness at 1.5T, the precision error was 3.0% and 2.6% for cartilage volume and cartilage thickness, respectively. The error was smaller for a 1.5‐mm partition thickness at 3.0T (2.6% and 2.5%) and still smaller for a 1.0‐mm partition thickness at 3.0T (2.1% and 2.0%). Correlation coefficients between values obtained at 3.0T and 1.5T were high (r ≥ 0.96), with no significant deviation between the two field strengths. Conclusion Quantitative MRI measurement of cartilage morphology at 3.0T (partition thickness 1 mm) was found to be accurate and tended to be more reproducible than at 1.5T (partition thickness 1.5 mm). Imaging at 3.0T may therefore provide superior ability to detect changes in cartilage status over time and to determine responses to treatment with structure‐modifying drugs.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Cartilage Morphology with Quantitative Magnetic Resonance ImagingSeminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 2004
- Toward Imaging Biomarkers for OsteoarthritisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2004
- Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: Relaxation Times and Image ContrastAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: Technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parametersArthritis & Rheumatism, 2004
- Femoro‐tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test–retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritisMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003
- Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 2003
- Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibilitySkeletal Radiology, 2003
- Role of MR Imaging in Clinical Research StudiesSeminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 2001
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: Accuracy, precision, and diagnostic valueArthritis & Rheumatism, 2001
- Radiological Assessment of Osteo-ArthrosisAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1957