A Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ertapenem versus Ceftriaxone for the Treatment of Community‐Acquired Pneumonia in Adults
Open Access
- 15 April 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 34 (8) , 1076-1083
- https://doi.org/10.1086/339543
Abstract
In a double-blind, multicenter trial, 502 patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia were randomized to receive therapy with either ertapenem or ceftriaxone (for each, 1 g given intravenously once daily). After a minimum of 3 days, therapy could be switched to oral amoxicillin-clavulanate. The median duration of intravenously administered therapy for the 383 clinically evaluable patients was 4 days for both treatment groups; 345 patients (90.1%) had their treatment switched to orally administered therapy. Of the clinically evaluable patients, 168 (92.3%) in the ertapenem group and 183 (91.0%) in the ceftriaxone group had a favorable clinical response. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most commonly isolated pathogen, and high cure rates were observed both for penicillin-susceptible and -nonsusceptible infections in the ertapenem group (28 [87.5%] of 32 patients versus 17 [100%] of 17 patients, respectively). Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated; the most common drug-related adverse events reported were diarrhea (2.9% versus 2.7%) and nausea (0.8% versus 2.0%) in the ertapenem and ceftriaxone groups, respectively. These results suggest that ertapenem and ceftriaxone therapy have similar efficacy and safety in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practice Guidelines for the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Increased activity of 16-membered lactone ring macrolides against erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae: characterization of South African isolates [In Process Citation]Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1998
- Community‐Acquired Pneumonia in Adults: Guidelines for ManagementClinical Infectious Diseases, 1998
- A Prediction Rule to Identify Low-Risk Patients with Community-Acquired PneumoniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysisJAMA, 1996
- Single daily dose of cefodizime in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: an open-label, controlled, randomized studyClinical Therapeutics, 1995
- Cefoperazone versus ceftriaxone monotherapy of nosocomial pneumoniaDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1992
- Comparative Efficacy of Ceftriaxone versus Ceftazidime in the Treatment of Nosocomial Lower Respiratory Tract InfectionsChemotherapy, 1991
- “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1982
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 TestsPublished by JSTOR ,1954