Saturation Analysis in Receptor Binding Assays: An Evaluation of Six Different Calculation Techniques
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
- Vol. 71 (1) , 45-51
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1992.tb00519.x
Abstract
Randomized errors to varying extents have been introduced in a constructed data set stimulating receptor binding saturation analyses. The parameters Bmax and Kd were then determined using six different evaluation techniques, four linear and two non-linear. It is concluded that a non-linear evaluation gives more reliable results, especially when errors are large. Furthermore, an inevitable correlation between Bmax and Kd regardless of evaluation technique results in possible misinterpretations of simultaneous changes in both parameters.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radioligand—receptor binding studies: what's wrong with the scatchard analysis?Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 1984
- Number of Receptor Sites from Scatchard and Klotz Graphs: A Constructive CritiqueScience, 1983
- Model Testing in Radioligand/Receptor Interaction by Monte Carlo SimulationJournal of Receptor Research, 1983
- Experimental Artifacts and the Analysis of Ligand Binding Data: Results of a Computer SimulationJournal of Receptor Research, 1983
- Numbers of Receptor Sites from Scatchard Graphs: Facts and FantasiesScience, 1982
- Scatchard plots: Common errors in correction and interpretationSteroids, 1975
- A graphic method for the determination and presentation of binding parameters in a complex systemAnalytical Biochemistry, 1967
- Non-Inverted Versus Inverted Plots in Enzyme KineticsNature, 1959
- THE ATTRACTIONS OF PROTEINS FOR SMALL MOLECULES AND IONSAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1949
- The Determination of Enzyme Dissociation ConstantsJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1934