Safety of Nifedipine in Angina Pectoris
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hypertension
- Vol. 33 (1) , 24-31
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.33.1.24
Abstract
—Our objective was to compare cardiovascular event rates in patients with stable angina receiving nifedipine as monotherapy or combination therapy and in active drug controls. A MEDLARS search of published articles from 1966 to 1995 in English, French, German, Italian, or Spanish, supplemented by a manual search of bibliographies, identified 60 randomized controlled trials that met protocol criteria. Blinded articles were extracted by 2 physicians. The pooled risks of death, withdrawal, and cardiovascular event were computed and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) for all nifedipine formulations and relative to same study control drug regimens. Thirty cardiovascular events were reported in 2635 nifedipine exposures (1.14%) and 19 events in 2655 other active drug exposures (0.72%). Unadjusted ORs for nifedipine versus controls were 1.40 (95% CI, 0.56 to 3.49) for major events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization procedure), 1.75 (95% CI, 0.83 to 3.67) for increased angina, and 1.61 (95% CI, 0.91 to 2.87) for all events (major events plus increased angina). Episodes of increased angina were more frequent on immediate-release nifedipine (OR, 4.19 [95% CI, 1.41 to 12.49]) and on nifedipine monotherapy (OR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.30 to 5.26]). The OR for immediate-release nifedipine was significantly higher than that for sustained-release/extended-release nifedipine ( P =0.001), and the OR for nifedipine monotherapy was higher than that for nifedipine combination therapy ( P =0.03). Increased risks of cardiovascular events in patients with stable angina on nifedipine were due primarily to more episodes of increased angina, confined to the immediate-release formulation and to nifedipine monotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety of Nifedipine in Patients With HypertensionHypertension, 1997
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- A randomised double-blind crossover study of isosorbide mononitrate and nifedipine retard in chronic stable anginaInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Randomized double-blind comparison of metoprolol, nifedipine, and their combination in chronic stable angina: Effects on total ischemic activity and heart rate at onset of ischemiaAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- The efficacy of the addition of nifedipine in patients with mixed angina compared to patients with classic exertional angina: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trialAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- Randomized double-blind comparison of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate therapy in variant angina pectoris due to coronary artery spasmAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981