Methodological commentary: Effect of measurement error on tests of statistical significance
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 458-462
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639708403872
Abstract
Using the domain-sampling model from classical test theory, the effects of measurement error on statistical tests for the difference between an obtained mean and a hypothesized mean, and the difference between two means, are demonstrated. The results indicate that lowering the reliability (i. e., increasing measurement error) of dependent variable data increases the chance of obtaining a nonsignificant result when a significant result is the correct outcome. Lowering the reliability also produces reduced estimates of strength of association.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revisiting the Standard Errors of Measurement, Estimate, and Prediction and Their Application to Test ScoresPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1996
- Reliability of Measurement and Power of Significance Tests Based on DifferencesApplied Psychological Measurement, 1993
- Some Comments on the Relation Between Reliability and Statistical PowerApplied Psychological Measurement, 1989
- Statistical Power Analysis and Reliability of MeasurementThe Journal of General Psychology, 1989
- Note on the reliability of experimental measures and the power of significance tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Practical Formulas of Strength of Association MeasuresEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
- Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and CovarianceReview of Educational Research, 1972
- A Note on the Generation of Random Normal DeviatesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958