Sponge versus diaphragm for contraception: a Cochrane review
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 67 (1) , 15-18
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00434-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and ElaborationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- What's up with nonoxynol-9?Reproductive Health Matters, 2000
- Do Spermicides Containing Nonoxynol-9 Prevent Sexually Transmitted Infections?Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 1998
- The contraceptive sponge: Factors in initiation and discontinuation of useContraception, 1989
- Nonmenstrual Toxic Shock Syndrome Associated with Barrier Contraceptives: Report of a Case-Control StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Parity and the effectiveness of the Today contraceptive spongeAdvances in Contraception, 1987
- Updated pregnancy rates for the Today contraceptive spongeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Parity and use-effectiveness with the contraceptive spongeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1986
- Toxic shock syndrome and the vaginal contraceptive spongeJAMA, 1986
- A comparative trial of the Today contraceptive sponge and diaphragmAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984